Toggle navigation
Resources
Help
FAQ
Limits
About SQP
Team & Contact
Publications
Presentations & Courses
Access
Login
Register
Database
Database
Filter by
Study
All
None
Mine
Interpersonal Trust Short Scale (KUSIV3)
2024_gesis_school
Absorptive Capacity
AC_HAP
Advertisment
Agriculture
Anlageentscheidungen
Athens Insomnia Scale for Non-Clinical Application (AIS-NCA)
Authoritarianism Short Scale (KSA-3)
B2B Decision-making Styles Scale
Basic Social Justice Orientations (BSJO) Scale
CAMCES pretest DE
CHATGPTTestStudy
CIS Questions
Comparative reliability strategies for single-item instruments
Cross-Cultural Loss Scale (CCLS)
CRSD Study Day
Cultural Capital (CA)
Czech Version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
democracy
Deutsche Version des Test of Mobile Phone Dependence Brief (TMD Brief-G)
Deutschsprachiges Instrument zur Erfassung der Kollektiven Orientierung (KO)
Drei- und Ein-Item-Skala zur Messung von Growth Mindset
Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998
EB 2010 (74.1)
EB 2012 (77.3)
EES 2014
Eindimensionale Skala zur Messung von Dankbarkeit (GQ-5-G)
el periodico
Embracing Catalan Culture
Employee Experience Questionnaire (EXQ): Fragebogen zur Messung von Zufriedenheit, Commitment und Engagement
English Translation of the SJT-TW
Environmental study
Epidemic-related Dark Future Scale for children (eDFS-K) using COVID-19 as an example
Epistemological attitudes in research scale (EARS-6)
EQLS 2012
ESADE
ESS 2012
ESS Pilot R10
ESS R10 Pretesting
ESS Round 1
ESS Round 10
ESS Round 2
ESS Round 3
ESS Round 4
ESS Round 5
ESS Round 6
ESS Round 7
ESS Round 8
ESS Round 9
EVS 2008
Familienstand, Kohabitation und Zusammenleben mit Partner*in
Feedback-Instrument zur Rettungskräfte Entwicklung - Einsatzübung (FIRE-E)
Feedback-Instrument zur Rettungskräfte Entwicklung - Planübungen (FIRE-PL)
Feedback-Instrument zur Rettungskräfte-Entwicklung (FIRE)
Feedback-Instrument zur Rettungskräfte-Entwicklung - Basisausbildung (FIRE-B)
Feedback-Instrument zur Rettungskräfte-Entwicklung - Führungsstab (FIRE-CU)
Feedback-Instrument zur Rettungskräfte-Entwicklung - Seminare und Tagesveranstaltungen (FIRE-ST)
Feedback-Instrument zur Rettungskräfte-Entwicklung – Aufgaben zum eigenverantwortlichen Arbeiten (FIRE-EV)
Feedback-Instrument zur Rettungskräfte-Entwicklung – Dozent (FIRE-DO)
Feedback-Instrument zur Rettungskräfte-Entwicklung – Gruppenarbeiten (FIRE-G)
Five-dimensional curiosity-scale (5DCR)
Fragebogen zur Messung von Informationsverarbeitung im Team (FIT)
Fragebogen zur Teamprozess-Messung (TP-M)
FReDA Subwave W1A, paper
FReDA Subwave W1A, smartphone
FReDA Subwave W1A, web
French Version of the General Self-Efficacy Short Scale (FASKU)
FreSiA
Fünfdimensionale überarbeitete Neugier-Skala (5DCR)
GAIA-6
General Life Satisfaction Short Scale (L-1)
General Self-Efficacy Short Scale-3 (GSE-3)
German Managerial Practice Survey (GMPS)
German Satisfaction with the Political System Short Scale (SPS)
German Version of the Extended DCA-Transparency Scale
GESIS 2024 1
GESIS 2024 2
GLES Querschnitt
GRowing@Work-Inventory (GR@W-I)
HA
Hausarbeit
Hausarbeit-Items
Hazing
High-Performance-Team-Survey (HPTS)
Human Flourishing Scale
ICT Self-Concept Scale (ICT-SC25)
IFES 1992: Economic expectations
IFES 1992: Life management
IFES 1992: Materialism/Postmaterialism
IFES 1992: Political parties
IFES 1992: Subjective life satisfaction 1
IFES 1992: Subjective life satisfaction 2
IFES 1992: Trust in institutions 1
IFES 1992: Trust in institutions 2
Impulsive Behavior Short Scale–8 (I-8)
Individuelle reflexive Werte Kurzskala (IRV–Kurzskala)
Internal–External Locus of Control Short Scale–4 (IE-4)
Inventar für Kollektive Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung (I-KSWE)
ISSP 2008
Justice Evaluation of the Income Distribution (JEID) Scale
Justice Sensitivity Short Scales–8 (JSS-8)
Kaja Sparre Bakke
krok
KUL 1989: Life satisfaction
KUL 1997: Immigration Ingroup
KUL 1997: Immigration Outgroup
KUL 1997: Immigration Threat
Kurzfragebogen zu Personaler Nostalgie (KPN)
Kurzskala für Präkrastination (KFP)
Kurzskala Soziale Dominanzorientierung (KSDO-3)
Learning Quality Inventory for In-Company Training in VET (VET-LQI)
LEQ-CI28
LEQ-CI34 (V1)
Life satisfaction study
Liss Panel
Luxembourg Workplace Mobbing Scale (LWMS)
Mehrdimensionale Skala zur Messung von Dankbarkeit (MCGM-G)
Messinstrument zur Identifikation von Studienabbruchneigung im dualen Studium (MISANDS)
MGP 1984-1987: feelings 1
MGP 1984-1987: feelings 2
MGP 1984-1987: health and income 1
MGP 1984-1987: health and income 2
MGP 1984-1987: life in general
MGP 1984-1987: saving/transport/safety
Miscellaneous
MN
Multigroup Ethnic and National Identity Measure (MENI): Inventar zur Erfassung der ethnischen und nationalen (deutschen) Identität
My personal Study for testing
MY556
Münsteraner Fragebogen zur Evaluation – Zusatzmodul digitale Lehre (MFE-ZdL)
Netquest: Estudio sobre bebidas
Netquest: Estudio sobre la mujer
Netquest: Estudio sobre restaurantes
Norwegian Citizen Panel W5
NTD
Old 1
Old 10
Old 101
Old 102
Old 103
Old 104
Old 105
Old 106
Old 107
Old 108
Old 109
Old 11
Old 110
Old 111
Old 112
Old 113
Old 114
Old 115
Old 116
Old 117
Old 118
Old 119
Old 12
Old 120
Old 121
Old 122
Old 123
Old 124
Old 125
Old 126
Old 127
Old 128
Old 129
Old 13
Old 130
Old 131
Old 132
Old 133
Old 135
Old 136
Old 137
Old 138
Old 139
Old 140
Old 141
Old 142
Old 143
Old 144
Old 145
Old 146
Old 147
Old 148
Old 149
Old 150
Old 151
Old 152
Old 153
Old 154
Old 155
Old 156
Old 157
Old 158
Old 2
Old 201
Old 202
Old 203
Old 204
Old 205
Old 206
Old 207
Old 208
Old 209
Old 210
Old 3
Old 4
Old 5
Old 6
Old 7
Old 8
Old 801
Old 802
Old 803
Old 804
Old 9
Omnibus ESS R7
Omnibus ESS R8
Opinions about Germany
Optimism–Pessimism Short Scale–2 (SOP2)
Organizational Commitment Scale (ISSP)
Panel Study ""Labour Market and Social Security"" (PASS)
Partisan Identity Scale (PIS)
Perceived Organisational Support (POS-s)
Personale Kundenorientierungsskala (PeKS)
Pilot 2015
Political Efficacy Short Scale (PESS)
Politische Ideologien (POLID)
Pretest Fragen WO
Pretest Fragen WO 2
Pretest Fragen WO 3
Pretest SDM 2019
PsySafety-Check (PS-C)
Random
RCX_study_1
Replicate and correct visual aid
Replicate and correct visual aid 3
Replicate and correct visual aid 4
Replicate and correct visual aid 5
Replicate and correct visual aid 6
Return Intentions of Migrants
Risk Proneness Short Scale (R-1)
Round 9 - pretesting
Russet
Scale for assessing study entry self-efficacy (SESW scale)
Scott's Test Survey
Seminar-Teststudie
Short scale affiliation to one’s own study program (ZeS)
Short Version of the Meta-cognitive Prospective Memory Inventory (MPMI-s)
Skala zur Messung der beruflichen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung (BSW-5-Rev)
Soc FFUK_2015
Social Desirability-Gamma Short Scale (KSE-G)
Social Effects, Social Protection and Sustainable Peace (SESPSP)
Social Protection and Sustainable Peace in the Niger Delta, Nigeria
SOEP
SOS3515/8535
Speak-Up-Check (S-U-C)
SQP Coding for translation training
SQP Tutorial
SQP Workshop
SRC 1981: Satisfaction with life
SRC January 1979: Finances, business, health, news 1
SRC January 1979: Finances, business, health, news 2
SRC January 1979: Finances, business, health, news 3
SRC January 1979: Finances, business, health, news 4
SRC July 1981: Finances, business, health, lastyear
SRC July 1981: Finances, business, health, nextyear
STP 1991: Values of family/ambition/independence 1
STP 1991: Values of family/ambition/independence 2
STP 1991: Values of family/ambition/independence 3
STP 1991: Values of family/ambition/independence 4
STP 1992: Life satisfaction 1
STP 1992: Life satisfaction 2
STP 1992: Life satisfaction 3
STP 1992: Life satisfaction 4
STP 1992: Living conditions 1
STP 1992: Living conditions 2
STP 1992: Living conditions 3
STP 1992: Living conditions 4
STP 1992: Seriousness of crimes
STP 1992: Values in life
STP 1992: Work conditions 1
STP 1992: Work conditions 2
STP 1992: Work conditions 3
STP 1992: Work conditions 4
STP 1996: Ethnic minorities 1
STP 1996: Ethnic minorities 2
STP 1996: Social problems
STP 1996: Social trust
Study 1
Study Test
surveygpttestapi
Test - can be deleted afterwards
Test - LSE
test 08122020
Test omarti
Test Politics
Test Study
test study2
test123
test23052020
Test_Es
test_ITEM
testapi
Testing
TFQ
The Challenged Sense of Belonging Scale (CSBS)
The Open Source Survey
The Perceived Political Self-Efficacy (P-PSE) Scale
The Survey Attitude Scale
transcendence scale
Travel
TrustinItalianGovernment
University of Trento Fun
Vier-Komponenten-Modell der Mitarbeiterbindung
VLOGGERS, MISINFORMATION, AND TRUST: UNPACKING PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS IN THE DIGITAL AGE
VP_2015
Wisconsin Longitudinal Study
wlsdg
Work habits and opinions
ZA5300
Question owner
All
None
Other users questions
Language
All
None
Afrikaans
Albanian
Arabic
Bengali, Bangla
Bulgarian
Catalan
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
French
Galician
German
Greek
Hebrew
Hungarian
Icelandic
Italian
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgeois
Norwegian
Norwegian Bokmål
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovene
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Country
All
None
Albania
Armenia
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Canada
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Guyana
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Kazakhstan
Kosovo
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
Nigeria
Norway
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russian Federation
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
SOURCE
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United States
Quality prediction
All
None
Based on authorized codings
Based on other users’ codings
Without quality prediction
Advanced filters
By text
By coding characteristic:
Absolute or comparative judgment
Balance of the request
Centrality
Computer assisted
Concept
Concept: complex concept
Concept: other simple concepts
Correspondence between labels and numbers of the scale
Domain
Domain: consumer behaviour
Domain: European politics
Domain: family
Domain: international politics
Domain: leisure activities
Domain: living conditions and background variables
Domain: national politics
Domain: other beliefs
Domain: personal relations
Domain: work
Don't know option
Emphasis on subjective opinion in request
Extra information or definition
Formulation of the request for an answer: basic choice
Horizontal or vertical scale
Information about the opinion of other people
Interviewer
Interviewer instruction
Introduction available?
Knowledge provided
Labels of categories
Labels with short text or complete sentences
Maximum possible value
Maximum possible value
Neutral category
Number of abstract nouns in answer scale
Number of abstract nouns in request for an answer
Number of categories
Number of fixed reference points
Number of nouns in answer scale
Number of nouns in request for an answer
Number of sentences in introduction
Number of sentences in the request
Number of subordinate clauses in request
Number of subordinated clauses in introduction
Number of syllables in answer scale
Number of syllables in request
Number of words in introduction
Number of words in request
Numbers or letters before the answer categories
Order of the labels
Overlap of scale labels and categories
Picture provided?
Position
Presence of encouragement to answer
Range of the used scale bipolar/unipolar
Reference period
Request for an answer type
Request on the visual aid
Request present in the introduction
Respondent instruction
Response scale: basic choice
Scale with only numbers or numbers in boxes
Showcard or other visual aids used
Social Desirability
Start of the response sentence on the visual aid
Symmetry of response scale
Theoretical range of the concept bipolar/unipolar
Use of gradation
Use of stimulus or statement in the request
Visual or oral presentation
WH word used in the request
×
Introduction available?
All
None
Delete
Available
Not available
×
Social Desirability
All
None
Delete
A bit
A lot
Not present
×
Centrality
All
None
Delete
A bit central
Central
Not at all central/salient
Rather central
Very central/salient
×
Domain: national politics
All
None
Delete
Agricultural matters
Defense matters
Economic/financial matters
Educational matters
Elections
Employer's organisations
Environmental matters
Legal matters
Local government
Local institutions
National government
National institutions (ministries, parliament, etc.)
National issues
Other
Political parties
Pressure groups
Prominent persons (ministers, members of parliament, etc.)
Trade unions and employee organisations
×
Domain: international politics
All
None
Delete
Other
Relations with Latin America
Relations with other European countries (non EC members)
Relations with the United Nations
Relations with the Unites States/Canada
×
Domain
All
None
Delete
Consumer behaviour
European Union politics
Family
Health
International politics
Leisure activities
Living conditions and background variables
National politics
Other domains
Personal relations
Work
×
Concept
All
None
Delete
All other simple concepts
Complex concepts
Evaluative belief
Expectation of future events
Facts, background, or behaviour
Feeling
Importance of something
×
Reference period
All
None
Delete
Future
Past
Present
×
Formulation of the request for an answer: basic choice
All
None
Delete
Direct request
Indirect request
No request present (e.g. not the first item of battery)
×
Use of stimulus or statement in the request
All
None
Delete
No stimulus or statement
Stimulus or statement is present
×
Use of gradation
All
None
Delete
Gradation used
No gradation used
×
Absolute or comparative judgment
All
None
Delete
A comparative judgement
An absolute judgement
×
Balance of the request
All
None
Delete
Balanced or not applicable
Unbalanced
×
Presence of encouragement to answer
All
None
Delete
Encouragement present
No particular encouragement present
×
Emphasis on subjective opinion in request
All
None
Delete
Emphasis on opinion present
No emphasis on opinion present
×
Information about the opinion of other people
All
None
Delete
Information about opinions of other present
No information about opinions of others
×
Response scale: basic choice
All
None
Delete
Line production
Magnitude estimation
More than two-categories scales
More-steps procedures
Numerical open-ended answers
Two-category scales
×
Labels of categories
All
None
Delete
Fully labelled
No labels
Partially labelled
×
Labels with short text or complete sentences
All
None
Delete
Complete sentences
Short text
×
Range of the used scale bipolar/unipolar
All
None
Delete
Bipolar
Unipolar
×
Correspondence between labels and numbers of the scale
All
None
Delete
High correspondence
Low correspondence
Medium correspondence
Not applicable
×
Symmetry of response scale
All
None
Delete
Asymmetric
Symmetric
×
Order of the labels
All
None
Delete
First label negative or not applicable
First label positive
×
Don't know option
All
None
Delete
DK option not present
DK option only registered
DK option present
×
Request for an answer type
All
None
Delete
Declarative
Imperative
Interrogative
None of the above
×
Respondent instruction
All
None
Delete
Absent
Present
×
Interviewer instruction
All
None
Delete
Absent
Present
×
Extra information or definition
All
None
Delete
Absent
Present
×
Request present in the introduction
All
None
Delete
Request not present
Request present
×
Knowledge provided
All
None
Delete
Both definitions and other explanations
Other explanations
Definitions only
No extra information provided
×
Showcard or other visual aids used
All
None
Delete
Not used
Used
×
Request on the visual aid
All
None
Delete
No
Yes
×
Start of the response sentence on the visual aid
All
None
Delete
No
Yes
×
Numbers or letters before the answer categories
All
None
Delete
-Not available- Letters
Neither
Numbers
×
Scale with only numbers or numbers in boxes
All
None
Delete
Numbers in boxes
Only numbers
×
Overlap of scale labels and categories
All
None
Delete
Overlap present
Text clearly connected to category
×
Horizontal or vertical scale
All
None
Delete
Horizontal
Vertical
×
Domain: family
All
None
Delete
Household matters
Other
Personal life history (childhood, adults, retirement)
Personal time budget
Relations to members
Relations to relatives
Size/composition
×
Domain: work
All
None
Delete
Change in occupation
Further education
Kind of work
Occupation
Other
Place of work
Prospects/career
Working hours
×
Domain: personal relations
All
None
Delete
Friends
Membership of organisations
Neighbours
Norms of other people
Other
Religion/philosophy
Workplace
×
Domain: consumer behaviour
All
None
Delete
Clothing
Durables (car, tv, computer, etc.)
Household budgetting
Housing expenditures
Insurances
Other
Preferences for payment
Saving and investment of money
Tobacco, liquor
×
Domain: leisure activities
All
None
Delete
Cultural activities (theatre, concert, exhibitions, etc.)
Internet
Newspapers/periodicals
Other activities
Radio
Restaurants/bars
Television
×
Domain: living conditions and background variables
All
None
Delete
Age
Education (schools, degrees, courses)
Ethnicity
Income
Marital status
Nationality
Other
Place of birth
Place of residence
Religion
×
Domain: other beliefs
All
None
Delete
Happiness
Life in general
Norms
Other
Philosophy
Race
Religion
Sexuality
Yourself
×
Concept: other simple concepts
All
None
Delete
Action tendency
Evaluation
Judgement
Norm
Policy
Preference
Relationship
Right
×
Concept: complex concept
All
None
Delete
Certainty of a judgement
Importance of a judgement
Other
×
Domain: European politics
All
None
Delete
Economic/financial matters
Elections
European Community government
European Community institutions
European Community issues
Other
Social matters
×
Theoretical range of the concept bipolar/unipolar
All
None
Delete
Theoretically bipolar
Theoretically unipolar
×
Neutral category
All
None
Delete
Not present
Present
×
Picture provided?
All
None
Delete
No picture provided
Picture provided
×
WH word used in the request
All
None
Delete
Request without WH word
WH word used
×
Computer assisted
All
None
Delete
No
Yes
×
Visual or oral presentation
All
None
Delete
Oral
Visual
×
Interviewer
All
None
Delete
No
Yes
×
Number of words in introduction
Delete
-
×
Number of sentences in introduction
Delete
-
×
Number of subordinated clauses in introduction
Delete
-
×
Number of sentences in the request
Delete
-
×
Number of words in request
Delete
-
×
Number of syllables in request
Delete
-
×
Number of subordinate clauses in request
Delete
-
×
Number of nouns in request for an answer
Delete
-
×
Number of abstract nouns in request for an answer
Delete
-
×
Number of syllables in answer scale
Delete
-
×
Number of nouns in answer scale
Delete
-
×
Number of abstract nouns in answer scale
Delete
-
×
Number of fixed reference points
Delete
-
×
Number of categories
Delete
-
×
Maximum possible value
Delete
-
×
Maximum possible value
Delete
-
×
Position
Delete
-
Applied filters
Studies:
Question owner:
Language:
Country:
Quality prediction :
Text:
Characteristics:
clear filters
apply filters
download
Legend of quality:
My codings
Authorized codings
Other users’ codings
Question
Study
Language
Country
Quality
Actions
D40
/
PPLSTRD
/
Immigration Multicultural, better if everyone shares customs
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D41
/
VRTRLG
/
Immigration Multicultural, better variety of religions
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D42
/
COMNLNG
/
Immigrations Multicultural, better if all speak language
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D43
/
ALWSPSC
/
Immigration Multicultural, children in separate schools
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D44
/
STIMRDT
/
Immigration Policies, stop immigration to reduce tensions
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D45
/
LWDSCWP
/
Immigration Policies, law against racial discrimination
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D46
/
LWPETH
/
Immigration Policies, law against racial hatred
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D47
/
Imgfrnd
/
Contacts Immigrants , any friend who is an immigrant
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D48
/
IMGCLG
/
Contacts Immigrants, immigrant work colleagues
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D49
/
SHRRFG
/
Asylum Perceptions, too much refugee status
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D50
/
RFGAWRK
/
Asylum Policies, refugee aplicants should work
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D51
/
GVRFGAP
/
Asylum Policies, government generous deciding refugee status
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D52
/
RFGFRPC
/
Asylum Perceptions, most refugee aren't persecuted
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D53
/
RFGDTCN
/
Asylum Policies, refugee applicants kept in detention centres
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D54
/
RFGGVFN
/
Asylum Policies, government should give refugee finantial support
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D55
/
RFGBFML
/
Asylum Policies, refugees allowed to bring family
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D56
/
NOIMBRO
/
Immigration Perceptions, of 100 people how many born outside
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D57
/
CPIMPOP
/
Immigration Perceptions, more immigrants come than to other countries
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
D58
/
BLNCMIG
/
Immigration Perceptions, compare number people leaving to coming
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
E1a
/
SPTCNN
/
Voluntary Organizations, participated in sports club
ESS Round 1
French
Luxembourg
Replicate
Total:
72665
filtered from
72665
questions
249
250
251
252
253
Add your own question and
add a question
obtain its quality prediction
Log in
Remember me
Sign up if you don’t have an account
log in
Test to real
×
Do you want add question to real environment?